hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26382] - Update license terms
Date Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:13:18 GMT
Eric,
I think you've made a very good point. Besides, as far as I understand
we can still stick to the version 1.1 if we manage to put the final
release together before the end of the month:

"...
The Apache License, version 2.0, was approved for use by Apache projects
as of January 21, 2004, with all Apache projects required to move to the
new license by March 1, 2004
..."

I believe we should cut the final release rather sooner than later, and
then upgrade to the AL v2.0

Oleg

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 19:14, Eric Johnson wrote:
> Knowing the speed with which corporate legal departments can move, I 
> would hope for keeping the old license for the 2.0 release.
> 
> I think it would be unfair/surprising for clients to discover that they 
> would have to do a legal an unexpected legal review just for the sake of 
> eliminating a few bugs.  In the case of my company, that would probably 
> keep us using 2.0rc3 for a few extra releases.
> 
> Then again, I'll have to check with legal....
> 
> On the other hand, given the small bandwidth for developers here, 
> perhaps it is just better to make the change, rather than messing around 
> with the PMC.
> 
> -Eric.
> 
> bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> 
> >DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
> >RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> ><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26382>.
> >ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
> >INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> >
> >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26382
> >
> >Update license terms
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------- Additional Comments From becke@u.washington.edu  2004-02-03 03:00 -------
> >I'm wondering if we should change licenses in mid release.  I do not know if 2.0
causes any 
> >problems for users, but it seems like a pretty big change for this release.  Perhaps
we can wait until 
> >after 2.0 is released.  How does everyone feel about this?
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message