Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-httpclient-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51535 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 21:02:10 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 21:02:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 23456 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 21:01:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-httpclient-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23269 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 21:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Commons HttpClient Project" Reply-To: "Commons HttpClient Project" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23256 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 21:01:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 21:01:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 26090 invoked by uid 50); 17 Sep 2003 21:04:56 -0000 Date: 17 Sep 2003 21:04:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20030917210456.26089.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15435] - New Preferences Architecture X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15435 New Preferences Architecture ------- Additional Comments From olegk@apache.org 2003-09-17 21:04 ------- Mike, The patch looks good to me. Wouldn't it be better, though, if java.util.Collection or java.util.Set were used to store multi-value parameters? I suppose in that way multi-value parameter would be easier to deal with. Imagine if one wanted to add an additional DateFormat to the standard set of DateFormats. That would require quite a bit of ugly code with the current implementation, I think. Cheers Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org