hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Joshua" <daniel.jos...@gridnode.com>
Subject RE: doubt on HttpClient design regarding HttpMethod
Date Tue, 23 Sep 2003 04:02:04 GMT
>the project started as a spin-off of a bigger one.

Yup, it started as part of Slide (eg. WebDAV).

Sadly, Slide is no longer that active, and its last release was 1.0.16
slightly more than two year ago.

<quote src="http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/news.html">
  11/06/2001 - Slide 1.0.16 (stable) released
</quote>



Regards,
Daniel


-----Original Message-----
From: Kalnichevski, Oleg [mailto:oleg.kalnichevski@bearingpoint.com]
Sent: Monday, 22 September, 2003 5:48 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: RE: doubt on HttpClient design regarding HttpMethod


Tarun,

>>From what I know of HttpClient's historical background the project started
as a spin-off of a bigger one. Many design decisions that were perfectly OK
for a bare-minimum library with a limited scope turned out quite
constraining once HttpClient started to evolve into a comprehensive
general-purpose HTTP toolkit. The first generation of HttpClient developers
is long gone already and we can only guess as to why certain things have
been designed the way they are today. 

We are perfectly aware of many shortcomings of the existing design
(including this one) and are planning to embark on a complete API overhaul
right after 2.1 release. HttpMethod interface split into
HttpRequest/HttpResponse pair is the very first item on our to-do list

Regards,

Oleg

-----Original Message-----
From: Elankath, Tarun (Cognizant) [mailto:ETarun@blr.cognizant.com]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:33 AM
To: commons-httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: doubt on HttpClient design regarding HttpMethod


Hi all,

I am new to HttpClient and was reading through its "Getting started"
section. What struck me immediately is that HttpMethods are full-fledged
objects of their own in HttpClient. I think this is a great idea.

However, I don't understand why HttpClient couldn't have something like a
HttpResponse object that is returned when execute() is called. It just seems
a bit kludgy to call getResponse() on the HttpMethod object itself.

Was there a design reason on why this was done ?

PLUS: I am enjoying this library. Thank you for it!

Regards,
Tarun

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message