hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21210] - HeaderElement#parse(String) implementation is not optimal
Date Tue, 01 Jul 2003 12:05:21 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21210>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21210

HeaderElement#parse(String) implementation is not optimal

olegk@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|Addition to header parsing  |HeaderElement#parse(String)
                   |due to Local Director       |implementation is not
                   |                            |optimal
   Target Milestone|---                         |2.1 Final
            Version|2.0 Alpha 2                 |2.0 Beta 1



------- Additional Comments From olegk@apache.org  2003-07-01 12:05 -------
Luca,
I believe the way HeaderElement#parse(String) method is currently implemented is
sub-optimal. The idea is to completely do away with that ugly check for comma in
the expiry date and let the DateParser decide whether the expiry date is
malformed or not. But we can't make such a radical change in 2.0 release. It
will have to wait until 2.1

Oleg

Mime
View raw message