hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kalnichevski, Oleg" <oleg.kalnichev...@bearingpoint.com>
Subject RE: 2.0 release
Date Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:25:31 GMT
Laura eventually conceded that these methods did not seem to make a lot of sense or were too
specialized to be of any use for the majority of the HttpClient users. 


I do think that releasing HttpClient with stuff that makes no sense DOES harm.

Again, after all, what is the bloody deal with writing a test case? Does it really have to
take 5 months if these methods indeed make sense?


-----Original Message-----
From:	Ortwin Gl├╝ck [mailto:ortwin.glueck@nose.ch]
Sent:	Thu 6/26/2003 10:05
To:	Commons HttpClient Project
Subject:	Re: 2.0 release
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
> I have only one outstanding issue on my hands: deprecation of
> URIUtil.toXXXCharset methods. 

As far as I remember these methods are not currently used. So they do 
not harm. We can address this later if necessary. The whole issue seems 
still a bit unclear to me, but Laura managed to shed some light on the 
problem. But as I see it the problem is more one of Java's Unicode 
Strings than one of HttpClient, and we will be unable to solve it.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message