hc-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19226] - NTLM authentication failed due to closing of connection
Date Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:54:58 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19226>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19226

NTLM authentication failed due to closing of connection





------- Additional Comments From becke@u.washington.edu  2003-04-28 12:54 -------
Oleg,

I hear what you are saying.  I agree that "Connection: keep-alive" is not good for proxies,
but I 
think "Proxy-connection" is totally safe.  It is quite strange that Proxy-connection is not

mentioned 
at all in RFC 2616, but that all proxies seem to use it.  From looking at a few newsgroup
posts it 
seems that Netscape added proxy-connection support some time ago and it just caught on.

The main reason I suggested adding a "keep-alive" is that it seems this is what all browsers

(that I 
tried) do.

For now, I would be happy always adding a Proxy-connection keep-alive when communicating 
with 
proxies.  I think we should also investigate connection keep-alive for non-proxied requests.

Are there any side effects of ignoring HTTP version?

Mike

Mime
View raw message