Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list commons-httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17995 invoked by uid 98); 16 Jan 2003 10:57:34 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Received: (qmail 17487 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 10:57:31 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (63.251.56.142) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 10:57:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 40757 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2003 10:55:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 40746 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 10:55:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nose.ch) (195.134.131.71) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 10:55:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 12916 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 10:56:09 -0000 Received: from calvin.nose.ch (HELO nose.ch) (192.168.1.7) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 10:56:09 -0000 Message-ID: <3E268FC9.6050102@nose.ch> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:56:09 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ortwin_Gl=FCck?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: de-ch, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: [PATCH] code page problem fix (revision 3) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Good morning Oleg God I felt really sick after last night and still have a sore stomach :-) But it was nice to meet you after all. Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: > I am getting no test case failures on my Linux box. If problem > persists with the new patch please let me know more about your > executing environment So I assume it's the one always failing on my box. I am using JBuilder 6 on Win2k with Tomcat 4 and JDK 1.4 to run the test cases. (not using Ant nor Maven for the moment) > If you see no massive problems with the patch, let's check in it, as > the patch gets really unwieldy. Minor problems can be solved with > incremental patches if required checked in. Cheers! Odi