Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list commons-httpclient-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15903 invoked by uid 98); 18 Dec 2002 17:33:12 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Received: (qmail 15867 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 17:33:09 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (63.251.56.142) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 17:33:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 90395 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2002 17:31:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 90354 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 17:31:50 -0000 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (140.142.33.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 17:31:50 -0000 Received: from mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.138]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.12) with SMTP id gBIHVrBc021261 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:31:53 -0800 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Dec 18 09:31:52 2002 -0800 Received: from u.washington.edu (ss01.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.12) with ESMTP id gBIHVpxl025190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:31:52 -0800 Message-ID: <3E00B0F8.3090601@u.washington.edu> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:31:36 -0500 From: Michael Becke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: Moving from HttpMultiClient to HttpClient References: <200212181610.LAA24413@www22.ureach.com> <3E00A46F.3070707@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <3E00A46F.3070707@sympatico.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yup. I'll be resubmitting it this evening. Mike Jeffrey Dever wrote: > Imminent, yes. A patch is out there, just needs minor tweaks and > resubmitted. > > otisg wrote: > >> Alright, that looks much more >> developer-friendly! :) >> Are these changes to Url*Method imminent? >> Making it into the upcoming Alpha release? >> An example of this, although probably >> trivially different from the one you posted, >> would probably be good, once the code is >> changed. >> >> Thanks, >> Otis >> >> >> ---- On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Michael Becke >> (becke@u.washington.edu) wrote: >> >> >> >>> There are a couple of options here. >>> >>> Option 1 (won't work until the Url*Method >>> >> >> patch is applied): >> >> >>> GetMethod get = new >>> >> >> GetMethod("http://news.google.com/"); >> >> >>> httpClient.executeMethod( get ); >>> >> >> >> ________________________________________________ >> Get your own "800" number >> Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more >> http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >