From user-return-56752-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@hbase.apache.org Fri Jul 17 15:12:00 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EE0018062C for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:12:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 39876 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2020 15:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 35064 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2020 15:09:20 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::435; helo=mail-wr1-x435.google.com; envelope-from=vinu.rm@gmail.com; receiver= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kuq/ZxJUk/qAwAor1/tBdvJzw/QM6RRjVG8Be9R1Mw0=; b=jchtpQA+enB8/32d3f1VwSxEYSKiTOYnMN8EV4nVGpjxrKE5r1aKk2QQyCUsGTULSK Xb6M4erinyYeYX1KTpWI04ZfnE/2mxXVDmT87qO/9RHtqwOGGuqPbfmWj33Er2yCXHlK vCxc41TG/Rb3INM2iA7Zq3mZGmGz58JWz4PJoWw3F5Csw6PIdiJK9EmY7NRJe/cDIKEA 2hIkQpThd5arg6Xr72ftxuCi/Dz1ik4fbEy7VgBt6ZO3P2DNuNM13BYnmdhCitRMlGVl RQpMlIp5ZMAw/4tG4jLy4YjCQBgG7GwuyYD823pbQU3j8aRlyXl0KRrUjb9t0zFev156 gs3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kuq/ZxJUk/qAwAor1/tBdvJzw/QM6RRjVG8Be9R1Mw0=; b=S3BoJiCV6mnELAAgKy+e0ELcnJ7vfabPWdZ6JhilOZCXCe8UlHkwhdaVlsjYXyNa/D kq5S8qr5kU9LgqlIckUw1bTKjvQ8Pe1zu8w3yzaFUTH7Ot1gzjc353XfXRVxrhJTn4Di cSUSkvEcf7fnCJHq32Lcohy4LC0PO1uZmiTH+MNyHp9Jprwixdt/L9AtyLXguQbNaZog PIxzCOnCRVy3ZjS+tkG+M35E4APU0jhBQBph7C3/iHnIa2to/08K273qoqmX8W9LUonK h2Hh5y/Yni4dnxkNBeMuAyILIJIm1CctAOdRsgzm/wsR1LeTpuk6H+augKOfx8GrPbbW LWfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RB2NV15D0bXGNCZnU+f0/XdrGDqtIQgyPD+whApk28EcCfE6k GRjRdyVkaT9i1YdqJa7Q6M7UAcqjied4do7pj9sShOis X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhl/jEonOiLd4cNsc7pF35+/7pHgDMlzvF0ZMSBBSleqRInNLFcDEZI3Rtc7KmAD6lz4tkd89Q0d+go0qXXZI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:c44d:: with SMTP id a13mr11007185wrg.205.1594998557509; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:09:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Vinu Raj Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 20:39:08 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Is HBase WAL replication from cluster with HBase 1.1.2 to cluster with HBase 2.0.2 supported ? To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000700ae205aaa48aeb" --000000000000700ae205aaa48aeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Is HBase WAL replication from cluster with HBase 1.1.2 to cluster with HBase 2.0.2 supported ? Tried a simple test where following table was created in both the cluster create 'repl_test', { NAME => 'cf1', REPLICATION_SCOPE => '1'} When issued enable_table_replication 'repl_test' to enable replication got following error message, which doesn't seem to be correct as I used the above mentioned statement to create the table in both the instances. ERROR: Table repl_test exists in peer cluster 1, but the table descriptors are not same when comapred with source cluster. Thus can not enable the table's replication switch. -Vinu --000000000000700ae205aaa48aeb--