Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALte62xQrn389=Tw=guNaYXgSMWNTnyaXn=8j_5TupLvdnRO6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+k9evEO3hPSBiKTK9upg2JJvJfdpjJJpRRTfkkSBJN0wB1MJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOtJ30o=_PzHva8_K1j9bN7ZnBxJCaFr5hug-_Sy028fdiGU5g@mail.gmail.com> <CALte62xQrn389=Tw=guNaYXgSMWNTnyaXn=8j_5TupLvdnRO6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Yokota <rayokota@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:55:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG0mBZQjE3Hn87jTsKATF2+KbX7LDMg+=RuwwPPwGhjW8Z6oLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ValueFilter returning earlier values
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f8e90740ab4054d9e8432
archived-at: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:55:17 -0000

--f403045f8e90740ab4054d9e8432
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I ran into this issue as well:
https://yokota.blog/2016/10/20/tips-on-writing-custom-hbase-filters/

Regards,
Robert

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> The JIRA number is HBASE-17125
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is because of the way with which filters and versions are checked
> > in RS.  We first do filter op and then apply version. The value filter
> > might have filtered out latest cell but it is applied and succeed on
> > older version and then only the version count begin..  There is an
> > open issue in HBase jira which aims at solving this unexpected
> > behavior.
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Sreeram <sreeram.v@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >  When I scan with ValueFilter on a column, I see that it returns older
> > > versions too if they happen to match the value in the ValueFilter.
> > >
> > > The table column family has the property VERSIONS set to 1. I had set
> > > setMaxVersions to 1 in the scan object.
> > >
> > > I was expecting the value filter to return only the latest values for
> > > the column, provided they match the filter.
> > >
> > > Is this the expected behaviour of ValueFilter? Any suggestions if I
> > > must be setting any options to skip the older values from coming in
> > > the result?
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sreeram
> >
>

--f403045f8e90740ab4054d9e8432--