hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dima Spivak <dimaspi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line
Date Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:10:42 GMT
+1

-Dima

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> I agree we should EOL 0.98.
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Please speak up if it is incorrect to interpret the lack of responses as
> > indicating consensus on declaring 0.98 EOL.
> >
> > I believe we should declare 0.98 EOL.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks!
> > >
> > > Back in January our Andrew Purtell stepped down as the release
> > > manager for the 0.98 release line.
> > >
> > > On the resultant dev@hbase thread[1] folks seemed largely in favor of
> > > declaring end-of-maintenance for the 0.98 line.
> > >
> > > Now that it's been a couple of months, does anyone have concerns about
> > > pushing forward on that?
> > >
> > > Do folks who listen on user@hbase but not dev@hbase have any concerns?
> > >
> > > As with any end-of-maintenance branch, the PMC would consider on a
> > > case-by-case basis doing a future release of the branch should a
> > > critical security vulnerability show up.
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/DjCi
> > >
> > > -busbey
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond
> > Teller (via Peter Watts)
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message