Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6776E200C39 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:43:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 65FF7160B78; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AB7E5160B70 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 00:43:17 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 55930 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2017 23:43:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 55917 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2017 23:43:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 23:43:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A5610C05AA for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:43:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.379 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ce0SjLtBtKRL for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com (mail-yw0-f177.google.com [209.85.161.177]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DDCEC5F1EE for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id d1so45404089ywd.2 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:43:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=b/3w/mwgynXf/rtqk4alAKN7XRtcyKYUxhO41WfRv8M=; b=JIcRo466NjROHkFwnUoP5rdgqK1xEUD3BXCaSMVDhgOq8FicmlGurjyFdHJfiix4pS 2YvoyeAZGs2cCesxhaEOq1JYpRMDHv4wLiArUT3V5iYMCNY+XOqN3c2sy0F8eJGeI6zr SmexzxFWY93+UzuVU+gyi3nHEEii9CNk8UDMIWjUQywe3ec2pFLnKPP9qGqgAKrQXeKz 0XCc2RGTp71jQNj5uydfY8aRyTDGam9dpYu2S6YRZFovE3Q7o1CU/3bTv1NVR3OrvtXp AzbLCTKoLtlo2BDQYhqFbYi6G+fuXpo0qln4W0wGDgp00nD+Yxa9zdm7eYtkX/lP0J// /pBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=b/3w/mwgynXf/rtqk4alAKN7XRtcyKYUxhO41WfRv8M=; b=SANRUzpf4QHdogYHTzcn05uNSYpbWWE6b+3/LNh9PxbnmLJbGUEa5YSj13tdqdWh0T ASftqGMQGmKxNmGFsc+O5BYPDROQhiHAkCMtECgNt/AOIwUpedxZmZl0ImV9be7fBPa+ XzEuxDEbLNp5JxcdXacjvWSkXzD27rDIV+GR8qse9ej6TaZBAgv815tkINrxPP5BDbnj lEg8u3Q2KPE2hRP+PuulpSykk+iGQhijcN9vbGSzlgbI22oaMdjnmie3IyJcYL2kDtk/ lGO7mDJreBEzUMzIXNBjz8+RS+9pFopRXwmW4xRic2XQnQ+wRmAQ1+PhxQ7J+MkDFliZ YGyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nZduyl50Wh12rVxEAni0/XG09iUvwmFki+1CxUBrKNt7s1EAx/5QHeOf6gQ8dHI6qO3N8IF7ra38ZCCg== X-Received: by 10.37.252.7 with SMTP id v7mr3547347ybd.109.1488411790766; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:43:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.223.12 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:43:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Yu Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:43:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: parallel processing of regions in coprocessor To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045dba64117adb0549b3e0b6 archived-at: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 23:43:18 -0000 --f403045dba64117adb0549b3e0b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To my knowledge, there is no support for this type of combination of map reduce and coprocessor. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Daniel Po=C5=82acza=C5=84ski wrote: > It is something like map reduce processing. > I want to run map and combine phase inside in a coprocessor for every > region separately, return partial results to the client. On the client > invoke reduce phase and store result in another hbase table. > > 2017-03-01 23:26 GMT+01:00 Ted Yu : > > > Can you describe your use case in more detail ? > > > > What type of custom coprocessor are you loading to the region server ? > > > > Thanks > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Po=C5=82acza=C5=84ski < > dpolaczanski@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Let's assume that we have cluster consisting from one RegionServer an= d > > the > > > RegionsServer contains one table consisting from 3 regions. > > > > > > I would like to process regions in coprocessor parallely. Is it > > possible? > > > > > > I observed that currenlty it invokes coproprocessor with all the > regions > > > one by one. So it process at the beginig region1, when finished proce= ss > > > regions2 and ... > > > > > > Is it possible to change this behaviour? > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > --f403045dba64117adb0549b3e0b6--