Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519CF200BD4 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:43:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5020D160B10; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 995E0160B0B for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:43:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1788 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2016 04:43:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 1771 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2016 04:43:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 04:43:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 392631AA295 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:43:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.799 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.799 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQfsGEXWW7ul for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6A1675F5F8 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c21so422995540ioj.1 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:43:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=2vdE11RH1/nLDUtMhDTdraPtWcCMoiTMrwiFF5yEslw=; b=AAYW9NZGPIW30nES+DAchdIjUZUgwV8nHNXL4uiHySFy/zC44KxXlVcUip6hoQkxpO x65v8zrdwSt2u8TPSwLUvmP1mbJm+mhu2pfDQtC/2q2fNlv13yu44f/uPfudHOqGvF2h zEEfOOKFfaB2cXCI7DXWS8nx4v8r+i31p6bWwvHUZPAN7z0EVUOvNAndm1R122BbzhVP 3E8839O8fY0AL1lWo8Mz/3n+2lpXi+6Bf7mDjhD65Ko9o1XJ1NJ3ZyaxhYvoV74eTYy3 er3Igqa20raYQaCP0aTs5wZKa1s6WSebI2iKzn5lWZcFHyzGSlcj2SLZphvrZQDo7+3p GUUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2vdE11RH1/nLDUtMhDTdraPtWcCMoiTMrwiFF5yEslw=; b=cP18wqxq9eL6h4u03cdhnjrQrcpsxuxVCtiFLNHr1VAVefK03uxNVy8P7yFaKXPPt2 dq1/wdghvM3xsG3ojEONLzoLMKvY5eychNyKzWpXkSS92ROTZPH9fq7CbKHlRlfTHLPG 9/Sh0fOCADrx7nYofWJ7M7wATFfSdGRykhJKMwzXLNXVqLmQzbvx+OKtI1XFZmltt0UY dsph6voR3h60J7SOMV8Jx2xI/FvrI4/tVIOeGxNuB9K27UxorRvvaY+CYATuuF7q/rg4 5A8bwZ5kTS8yPKynuUpDqvaNjLkjGLnd7TvOugX/wa0LBFeoUzdyaRqxr8ohAmLoYAiW r/qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00aVJj4fYe1tfzJi9WA9UnfqyhekK1T9sDumFqBfdf4ESt/IFXWpwo9BsUtbnqnniEIboYc1cZr8lBL5A== X-Received: by 10.107.17.38 with SMTP id z38mr37375865ioi.48.1480653819203; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:43:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.148.83 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:43:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stack Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:43:38 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: M7B5O_cZ5VJsB0_pDKaZBFCmDWQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: High CPU Utilization by meta region To: Hbase-User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f6644edf9e60542a59460 archived-at: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 04:43:46 -0000 --001a113f6644edf9e60542a59460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Timothy Brown wrote: > > > > > > If you turn on RPC-level TRACE logging for a minute or so, anything about > > the client addresses that seems interesting? > > > Nothing seemed interesting to me but you may have a different opinion. > Here's the logs http://pastebin.com/FE8qVNH4 > > Yeah. Nothing in there. There is no TRACE logging in there. St.Ack --001a113f6644edf9e60542a59460--