hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Date Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:36:05 GMT
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Denise Rogers <datagwal@aol.com> wrote:

> Does the Doc also include information on updates and what actually happens
> to record? Are the values actually replaced or is the old record aged out
> and replaced with a new on?
>
>
You are asking about HBase in general Denise? For all HBase versions, we do
not replace records. We add a new one.

St.Ack




> Regards,
> Denise
>
>
> Sent from mi iPhone
>
> > On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
> >>> across minor release lines.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
> >>
> >> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
> >> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
> >>
> >>
> > This is taking a while. Publication of the site seems to down at the
> moment
> > and our little site builder jenkins job is stalled trying to find a host
> to
> > run its build on.
> >
> > Meantime, I got a snapshot of 1.1 docs up here:
> > http://hbase.apache.org/1.1/devapidocs/index.html
> >
> > Will add links and the 1.1.7 doc when build comes back.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
> >>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
> >>> question
> >>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user
> or
> >>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current
hbase
> >>> book
> >>>>> (
> >>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only
> >>> for 2.0
> >>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users
to
> >>> refer
> >>>>> to?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
> >>> later
> >>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
> >>> performance
> >>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>> Yu
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
> >>>>
> >>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
> >>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
> into
> >>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes.
> Doc
> >>> is
> >>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
> >>> version-specific
> >>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here
> (and
> >>> in
> >>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
> >>>>
> >>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this
> is
> >>> the
> >>>> case.
> >>>>
> >>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc.,
we
> >>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> St.Ack
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite
> >>> often -
> >>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying
from
> >>> the
> >>>>>> book
> >>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is
not needed for
> >>>>>>>> building
> >>>>>>>> the site.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published
on the
> >>> website.
> >>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build
it for you
> >>> locally.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
> >>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate
site
> >>>>>> assembly:single`
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>   We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1.
Some methods of
> >>>>> hbase
> >>>>>>>>>> 0.94
> >>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone
post me the link
> >>> for
> >>>>> Api
> >>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't
find that.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> busbey
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message