hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denise Rogers <datag...@aol.com>
Subject Re: Hbase 1.1.1 API documentation link
Date Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:46:52 GMT
That's my understanding as well. But there's no documentation that states that. 

Regards,
Denise


Sent from mi iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2016, at 7:36 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Denise Rogers <datagwal@aol.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Does the Doc also include information on updates and what actually happens
>> to record? Are the values actually replaced or is the old record aged out
>> and replaced with a new on?
>> 
>> 
> You are asking about HBase in general Denise? For all HBase versions, we do
> not replace records. We add a new one.
> 
> St.Ack
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>> Denise
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from mi iPhone
>> 
>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably
>>>>> across minor release lines.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally.
>>>> 
>>>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link
>>>> to 1.1. doc. this evening.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> This is taking a while. Publication of the site seems to down at the
>> moment
>>> and our little site builder jenkins job is stalled trying to find a host
>> to
>>> run its build on.
>>> 
>>> Meantime, I got a snapshot of 1.1 docs up here:
>>> http://hbase.apache.org/1.1/devapidocs/index.html
>>> 
>>> Will add links and the 1.1.7 doc when build comes back.
>>> 
>>> St.Ack
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> St.Ack
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially:
>>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good
>>>>> question
>>>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for
user
>> or
>>>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current
hbase
>>>>> book
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features
only
>>>>> for 2.0
>>>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all
users to
>>>>> refer
>>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions
>>>>> later
>>>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 (
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes
>>>>> performance
>>>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Yu
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific
>>>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc
>> into
>>>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes.
>> Doc
>>>>> is
>>>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a
>>>>> version-specific
>>>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here
>> (and
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this
>> is
>>>>> the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc.,
we
>>>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email
quite
>>>>> often -
>>>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just
copying from
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> book
>>>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal
is not needed for
>>>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>>>> the site.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published
on the
>>>>> website.
>>>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build
it for you
>>>>> locally.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate
site
>>>>>>>> assembly:single`
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>  We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1.
Some methods of
>>>>>>> hbase
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.94
>>>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone
post me the link
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> Api
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as
I can't find that.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> busbey
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message