Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE075200B68 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:08:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id ACB11160AAB; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id EF268160A79 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:08:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 88446 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2016 19:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 88430 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2016 19:08:54 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:08:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C03C81A52E5 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:08:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mesmhumo1dra for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id EFDBA5F30E for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q128so10548066wma.1 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w1kK8wczcI+A8JBO5Bn8OAaRr8rZxITnZ5hdk6MkdJU=; b=RievZZ1iU4mg3UzkGZnRP4YzNh7kOQq1NwOnKaAXfRERkWl5RoTyywX6C9kivvSbWZ P1mSx2+UNigR6WqidKQ44Bn5XaXT9XSkZs3aXRaH5YCxQmVXdYFw1t4WSzp5M4W+Q0zv vTLulY/kEYq1t/sniJAzcnkpNuVamhGVgu3VhoCCeEAWkOYUNG3jzl1BOyHfG5It3I6G SMO8vJkTGSIB2pFU9eRqRbPYkI1X3/N4v7IQHORsjStwnRmHRn+xHd/7gHDNec6X6JkX /ruoiu+LnlerpFeX6JuACQn0urNK5luLiLhBv+W8ky58mmQHKpi5l99y7FPc8YoUPFFe by/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=w1kK8wczcI+A8JBO5Bn8OAaRr8rZxITnZ5hdk6MkdJU=; b=BQ3WeZn2wpVRnrzJ579pRhp63/Pnpg54cIQbV8qZWYDhJ0jcIN3oi4aCLrpVonH94f MqBuHslpjzvQEfDAUeHhhDOWwefGvRW9/ZP8z4Q0LRMV+9Mj5HYG83LdsNVH4lFuOv6M qv/9VKXqBbwor6It433avbxBCpNtrb59LLJSb3DEGYRMmtuPJMviaqK/nXHJWwnae1yS EL8Q0TPF34/T1X/Kz+yNCL2+2+47NkRfZ2BWxhiU6b/Hb7keQYn63EbIopv0SjJXuSA2 YvERCNOlBaNlRI/M2OFuGrgiawZAPiaVCGx1JphnYAFRYkpcNkJ/DjkerGurifNxTRvC Fb2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousN/tgbqrtgaRw4a7ybP9nQIK/Hc4s9gM9cOche5uNPwn4pQ1P61D0U7e2vi5BRG+WFbCO7H0g9RRr2ow== X-Received: by 10.194.149.113 with SMTP id tz17mr7569992wjb.64.1471633730475; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.186.5 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:08:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Vladimir Rodionov Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:08:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hbase federated cluster for messages To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01160dfabea07d053a716dca archived-at: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:08:56 -0000 --089e01160dfabea07d053a716dca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> I am not sure how to do it but I have to configure federated cluster with >> hbase to store huge amount of messages (client to client) (40% writes, 60% >> reads). Any particular reason for federated cluster? How huge is huge amount and what is the message size? -Vladimir On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Dima Spivak wrote: > As far as I know, HBase doesn't support spreading tables across namespaces; > you'd have to point it at one namenode at a time. I've heard of people > trying to run multiple HBase instances in order to get access to all their > HDFS data, but it doesn't tend to be much fun. > > -Dima > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Alexandr Porunov < > alexandr.porunov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am not sure how to do it but I have to configure federated cluster with > > hbase to store huge amount of messages (client to client) (40% writes, > 60% > > reads). Does somebody have any idea or examples how to configure it? > > > > Of course we can configure hdfs in a federated mode but as for me it > isn't > > suitable for hbase. If we want to save message from client 1 to client 2 > in > > the hbase cluster then how hbase know in which namespace it have to save > > it? Which namenode will be responsible for that message? How we can read > > client messages? > > > > Give me any ideas, please > > > > Sincerely, > > Alexandr > > > > > > -- > -Dima > --089e01160dfabea07d053a716dca--