Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FAD819845 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 03:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45472 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2016 03:38:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 45395 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2016 03:38:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 45383 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2016 03:38:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 03:38:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D16B91A027F for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 03:38:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.192 X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.192 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IlyNXBgGdwU9 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 03:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com (mail-yw0-f171.google.com [209.85.161.171]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A6BF25F393 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 03:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f171.google.com with SMTP id g127so47039867ywf.2 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:38:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=nfeD8LYVDkglD+eX1wrjZFUMkwaT5IwvXKUxGWnsBYY=; b=SM8H9ig8qK0AD7lw2MgHjViOkz0vKAiqSEnDH7EYoLfOI1SOuHMCu6B9XMh3cXK3E3 B2mFcOZJuhAWUeV2QXGeNtUvuOqubycndETajxJotW1wmTGaIPEhOP/mr1jBl1mdPrHJ n/qZXzYM9H29xABqYo2tgSkxJp0Q4coAqSEd5ldtz2g+flwUnbKP4cK4tGyJPAvnQLmh x4AW5W344Ym5l0/edn802O3hTmdl7SOpEN5p/REQrK2rrVkhdKFPKzereRz9iFLYRwEv XA3Kz0BPQ7KjCz06nHRCkYC/mqziCa78/gXQ5JgYnNlatUd/IJTlS57y/BkyG5WFW7xg 8hNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=nfeD8LYVDkglD+eX1wrjZFUMkwaT5IwvXKUxGWnsBYY=; b=g9cjklGB8EoOAYYS8d3nmtCZ7EjgFP7s+4ztgVkZEiQr0mOFiFRs7c8Js5sXhYdwFn xnoMRHxG4yF9kiayrXcNW/FFDrfQMlZjYzXge2QISmkognrVMKKU92QCi2VcXGwm1rdB HtSc1VjlubaNawHmggIlflP9xcgvxJq9H3RmFdT1yKaBk8MHAj26S7aiV3TOxQ2Woejy PUb4RAq8zVNCCjOObIcFoyBERn0HrcwfnJydJycPd2lLOs4jL1DS40UTOoypdL7iIIzp xOHE0k7awKjq5elNaksiaVfsVlXHTsFBniV5lkPJ6xVSBxhWCXkD0nS3Tuqi/LZ9RC2p C5hQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKZSkBXIomsg/O/vnNisQb8AtOLrvAxqe9x+8uxBkZDC1FGSVISB+L8goxL+E49O0PCv50mo7OwtrM9Rg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.13.225.133 with SMTP id k127mr680577ywe.20.1458099528579; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.208.4 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:38:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1458085425295-4078497.post@n3.nabble.com> References: <1458085425295-4078497.post@n3.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:38:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: why Hbase only split regions in one RegionServer From: Ted Yu To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c064dfe72de01052e2240e3 --94eb2c064dfe72de01052e2240e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 When one region is split into two, both daughter regions are opened on the same server where parent region was opened. Can you provide a bit more information: release of hbase whether balancer was turned on - you can inspect master log to see if balancer was on Consider pastebinning portion of master log. Thanks On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:43 PM, jackwang wrote: > I was writing 300GiB data to my Hbase table user_info, the table I created > by > default having only one region. When the writing was going I saw one region > became two regions and more late on it became 8 regions. But my confusion > is > that the 8 regions were kept in the same RegionServer. > > Why Hbase didn't split the regions to different RegionServer. btw, I had 10 > physical RegionsServers in my Hbase cluster, and the region size I set is > 20GiB, Thanks! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/why-Hbase-only-split-regions-in-one-RegionServer-tp4078497.html > Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --94eb2c064dfe72de01052e2240e3--