Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEFAA18713 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13200 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2015 22:43:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13132 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2015 22:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13116 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2015 22:43:50 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 22:43:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 03213181995 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:43:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.487 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.487 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQISAOxyl97r for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 03F9F20647 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mben.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.72]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0303427DB605 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:43:41 -0700 (MST) From: milindshah To: user@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1441320221821-4074410.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1441312830637-4074403.post@n3.nabble.com> <1441319118144-4074407.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Multiwal performance with HBase 1.x MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Unfortunately, I don't have SSDs at this point. The reason I put that test configuration is because I have 12 drives. With replication = 3, I am planning to go set numgroups=4 (1/3 of total spindles). Milind -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Multiwal-performance-with-HBase-1-x-tp4074403p4074410.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.