Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A86118F15 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73459 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2015 22:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73224 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2015 22:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73118 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2015 22:58:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:58:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C1365C006D; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:58:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 254bgPcycGow; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vn0-f49.google.com (mail-vn0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 001D9275F3; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vnav203 with SMTP id v203so13233428vna.6; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:58:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5VQDwN4cVlzjz6dtXubL4KlDW7654pa6eOZLMhsJnX0=; b=nzTas6TlQc1SPqLgUeORAiQ6ht2/ptbwlGQal+JcG2AoNy51faazUKPkU5rY4BY85Z 5yTlbiXTsu3HcMqsCh3Ezbw8i5PTVKOqgNKlRt812GffVX/eu1EkuMeXqMPzMGr3vV/5 yQyOK0MDuEs+eCMSQDV/HdINk3pO86TsWZSq1v3GULNBBsOso7PPWgpEjVSPrdSI5l8i leMIuw1nRK7WA9JNXXyz0f8zRVvy8BX3n0UX9KOAGa/mbyXdI+P6ooHmWLhk62/4svv1 xWkctPc+0SldvwP/q+WoY2Nflv1KQhdvYboi7EKy4skjROBh5gLpovE7/u+UBst9BcGj nthQ== X-Received: by 10.52.6.8 with SMTP id w8mr43644970vdw.85.1435273099154; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:58:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.150.202 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Enis_S=C3=B6ztutar?= Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:57:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.1 (RC0) is available To: hbase-user Cc: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334d8d3b1eb305195f8fcd --20cf30334d8d3b1eb305195f8fcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Slight correction, ITBLL needs numKeys to be a multiple of 1M. See the javadoc and ascii art at the code. Enis On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar wr= ote: > ITBLL requires at least 1M per mapper. You can run with less number of > mappers and numKeys =3D 1M. > > Enis > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: > >> 2015-06-24 22:29 GMT-04:00 Enis S=C3=B6ztutar : >> >> > > >> > > Also, I tried to run IntegrationTestBigLinkedList and it fails: >> > > 015-06-24 19:06:11,644 ERROR [main] >> > > test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Verify: Expected referenced count >> does >> > > not match with actual referenced count. expected referenced=3D100000= 0 >> > > ,actual=3D0 >> > > >> > >> > What are the command line arguments passed? Verify cannot find any >> > references? >> > >> >> I ran this: >> bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList loop= 3 >> 100 10000 /tmp/loop 10 >> >> I can retry with any other if it helps. >> >> >> > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > And last I ran IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify but I have no idea how t= o >> > > interpret the result ;) >> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counte= rs >> > > REFERENCES_WRITTEN=3D19800000 >> > > ROWS_WRITTEN=3D20000000 >> > > >> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counte= rs >> > > REFERENCES_CHECKED=3D1036925998 >> > > ROWS_WRITTEN=3D0 >> > > >> > >> > This is a bit fishy. Again, what are the parameters passed? Did you ru= n >> > with a clean cluster state? >> > >> >> >> Was always doing that before any test: >> echo "disable 'IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify'; drop >> 'IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify'" | bin/hbase shell >> >> And ran with this command: >> bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify >> loadAndVerify >> >> >> >> > >> > For these two tests, I think there is at least 3 or so bugs already >> fixed >> > in theory. Our tests and my 1.2B row tests on a previous branch-1.1 co= de >> > base was ok. >> > >> > >> >> Also, any idea why non of the tests pass on my side? >> I tried some of them individually and they passed: >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> T E S T S >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestClockSkewDetection >> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.69 sec= - >> in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestClockSkewDetection >> Results : >> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 >> >> But it prevents me to run the entire test suite at once. I will give it >> few >> more tries today... >> >> JM >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > So. It seems to be working on my cluster, but I have not been able t= o >> get >> > > any successful test. Therefore I'm a bit reluctant to say +1 and wil= l >> > only >> > > say +/-0.... >> > > >> > > For pefs tests, I still need some more work on my clusters... So not >> for >> > > this release. >> > > >> > > JM >> > > >> > > 2015-06-24 16:25 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu : >> > > >> > > > +1 >> > > > >> > > > Ran test suite against Java 1.8.0_45 >> > > > Checked signature >> > > > Practiced basic shell commands >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Nick Dimiduk >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.1 >> > > > > (HBase-1.1.1RC0) is available for download at >> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.1RC0/ >> > > > > >> > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >> > > > > >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1087/ >> > > > > >> > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey >> 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >> > > > > available in the Apache keys directory >> > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >> > > > > >> > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=3Dhbase.git;a=3Dtag;h=3Daf1934= d826cab80f727e9a95c5b564f04da73259 >> > > > > >> > > > > HBase 1.1.1 is the first patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, >> > > continuing >> > > > on >> > > > > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop >> and >> > > NoSQL >> > > > > communities. This release includes over 100 bug fixes since the >> 1.1.0 >> > > > > release, including an assignment manager bug that can lead to da= ta >> > loss >> > > > in >> > > > > rare cases. Users of 1.1.0 are strongly encouraged to update to >> 1.1.1 >> > > as >> > > > > soon as possible. >> > > > > >> > > > > The full list of issues can be found at >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D12310= 753&version=3D12332169 >> > > > > >> > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by midnight Pacific >> time >> > on >> > > > > Sunday, 2015-06-28 as to whether we should release these >> artifacts as >> > > > HBase >> > > > > 1.1.1. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Nick >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > --20cf30334d8d3b1eb305195f8fcd--