Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0ACFD17BC3 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52664 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2015 21:31:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 52596 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2015 21:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 52581 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2015 21:31:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:31:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7796EC0DFB for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:31:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.637 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.637 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=3, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iU7v3LKAjnyf for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com (mail-qk0-f179.google.com [209.85.220.179]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DB6F247C03 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkhg32 with SMTP id g32so91316795qkh.0 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:29:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HfiGjslQMgo0LcK8gCsqZ0Ws1+9S3AZPppCIPact8oQ=; b=P1p1X0vINStxH1SjXxcBv8EN6Phmko62y8xLJYu+iejXtE43PjG5DmGpQmOAM5pcCn 4iGvS4DmBGCw/IZLHyZo5/omUfeoNf2KMX45nc5h07EMLcLmxbmERTX64IeAWswf+gxg JDE4riRwHYX7wQjV6OReobdPM4E0YrjWk84N95qVqfBwHFpWh2360KFm7dYS68tjKpOJ QOhL+56KKsJekRMNSpP/qb74tk/YRvr848mKN1x+p63jznOHx7uMyDfPOelaqCYda/QH UmpoqW97ixouYqeAiJUcWunlhg23zj4R8LeBSIWZ6HI9ZSEYlGveg+XmiWptm1dXcfN8 rI9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.104.147 with SMTP id a19mr19144621qgf.71.1433194170884; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.83.199 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:29:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hbase vs Cassandra From: Vladimir Rodionov To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134f58e73286305177b85ff --001a1134f58e73286305177b85ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> The key issue is that unless you need or want to use Hadoop, you shouldn=E2=80=99t be using HBase. Its not a stand alone product or system. Hello, what is use case of a big data application w/o Hadoop? -Vlad On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Michael Segel wrote: > Saying Ambari rules is like saying that you like to drink MD 20/20 and > calling it a fine wine. > > Sorry to all the Hortonworks guys but Amabari has a long way to go=E2=80= =A6. very > immature. > > What that has to do with Cassandra vs HBase? I haven=E2=80=99t a clue. > > The key issue is that unless you need or want to use Hadoop, you shouldn= =E2=80=99t > be using HBase. Its not a stand alone product or system. > > > > > > On May 30, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Serega Sheypak > wrote: > > > > 1. No killer features comparing to hbase > > 2.terrible!!! Ambari/cloudera manager rulezzz. Netflix has its own tool > for > > Cassandra but it doesn't support vnodes. > > 3. Rumors say it fast when it works;) the reason- it can silently drop > data > > you try to write. > > 4. Timeseries is a nightmare. The easiest approach is just replicate da= ta > > to hdfs, partition it by hour/day and run spark/scalding/pig/hive/Impal= a > > > > =D0=BF=D1=8F=D1=82=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=86=D0=B0, 29 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=8F 2015 = =D0=B3. =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB= =D1=8C Ajay =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I need some info on Hbase vs Cassandra as a data store (in general plu= s > >> specific to time series data). > >> > >> The comparison in the following helps: > >> 1: features > >> 2: deployment and monitoring > >> 3: performance > >> 4: anything else > >> > >> Thanks > >> Ajay > >> > > --001a1134f58e73286305177b85ff--