Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76F02172C3 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 17:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15066 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2015 17:44:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 14997 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2015 17:44:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 14984 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2015 17:44:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2015 17:44:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B98D4C2990 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.18 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.18 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ub2OPubxttz for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 17:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0089340E1C for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 17:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so38288593wiz.1 for ; Fri, 08 May 2015 10:44:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gb0sOmgrLQERj8+3CkQogyY+rSg2PtzkMB45In9+cZc=; b=HLhan618bGZ/+C6WP/YOdtv8Z+SXhGYjLottQ9/N+Y5J94PU3mBnrOlMxbxJq977iC baFKup9MYCrN2oDFtS5UMXgnTU+DivQp/K84wgOd68TcBBv/+9IgXocvvXcxt7ARHF2y DyWX9tGoF65a8taCabZ5rAcFn6ZqOkkLMyg4GOwVn/XnO086sv88fet/SMJNzkAme3NE 6jrnkdNrnkx8oS6LuW72e6PGfzp6ko5DxbGzNE2J1NZ+yTEHrIt5lsLiGeI7oIRn2vlQ mgSRjNS9DPdDFvhtLSHPrQMyymh3nWAMYl2BdmOCt6T1O2Y9MGHo57CrXUltOhI5Nucl FNKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.178.227 with SMTP id db3mr9308791wjc.82.1431107070091; Fri, 08 May 2015 10:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.51.17 with HTTP; Fri, 8 May 2015 10:44:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1742399910.3329798.1431097471864.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1742399910.3329798.1431097471864.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 23:14:30 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Test failure for HBase 0.94.18 against hadoop 2.2.0 From: Kuldeep Bora To: user@hbase.apache.org, lars hofhansl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc5188c69a405159594ca --089e013cc5188c69a405159594ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I had some success with this after following https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop2.hbase_0.94 All out test cases are passing for hbase 0.98.14 and hadoop 2.4.0, but hbase tests are still failing. I have filed the following jira as lars suggested. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13650 Thanks On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:34 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > Hi Kuldeep, > > could you file a jira with the error you see? > Some folks are still using 0.94, so we should see whether we can fix it. > > > -- Lars > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kuldeep Bora > To: user@hbase.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 7:59 AM > Subject: Re: Test failure for HBase 0.94.18 against hadoop 2.2.0 > > Thanks for the reply Jean. > > I wonder how Amazon EMR is still running hbase 0.94.18 with hadoop 2.2.0 > even 2.4.0. > > Its weird that they are patching it internally but not publishing deps to > maven! > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-marc@spaggiari.org > > wrote: > > > Hi Kuldeep, > > > > Hadoop 2.2 is not tested with HBase 0.94 => > > https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop > > > > You might be better to move to HBase 0.98 or 1.0. > > > > Regards, > > > > JM > > > > 2015-05-07 9:23 GMT-04:00 Kuldeep Bora : > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am trying to test hbase 0.94.18 against hadoop 2.2.0. > > > I changed hadoop.version in haddop-2.0 profile to 2.2.0. And on running > > > tests i get following failure. > > > > > > Results : > > > > > > Tests in error: > > > > > > > > > > > > testRegionObserverCompactionTimeStacking(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook): > > > class > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.proto.ClientNamenodeProtocolProtos$DeleteSnapshotResponseProto > > > overrides final method > > > getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet; > > > testCalls(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.TestProtocolExtension): Could > not > > > set up IO Streams > > > > > > Tests run: 728, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0 > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > --089e013cc5188c69a405159594ca--