hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Date Wed, 06 May 2015 17:13:39 GMT
I prefer to patch the POMs. 



> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating the
> poms and sinking the RC?
> 
>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
>>> rarely changes.
>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating dependencies
>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
>> 
>> --
>> Sean
>> 

Mime
View raw message