hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudrea...@hubspot.com>
Subject Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Date Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:11:07 GMT
Super useful, thanks Dave!

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Dave Latham <latham@davelink.net> wrote:

> If you haven't already seen it - take a look at the bridge at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12814
> We're using it to go through the process now.
>
> Dave
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bryan Beaudreault <
> bbeaudreault@hubspot.com
> > wrote:
>
> > My only complaint about this poll is the labels: "0.94.x - I like stable
> > releases".  It's not really about the stable releases for me, it's more
> > about the extremely difficulty of overcoming "the singularity" from 0.94
> ->
> > 0.96+ with no downtime in a reasonably complex production system.
> > Hortonwork's replication bridge may help with this, and we're hoping to
> put
> > engineering effort into this sometime this year.  But I'm sure I'm not
> the
> > only one for whom this is the sole reason to still be on 0.94.
> Otherwise I
> > can't wait for the features and bug fixes in later versions and would
> > welcome *any* tools or JIRAs to help soften the blow of this upgrade.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:09 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a
> > > small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does
> > not
> > > count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines.
> > > -- Lars
> > >       From: Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com>
> > >  To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
> > >  Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM
> > >  Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Let's see where we are! :)
> > >
> > > 1-question poll:
> > > http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
> > >
> > > Btw:
> > > 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
> > > 60% 0.94
> > > 30% 0.96
> > > 10% 0.98
> > >
> > > Another person said:
> > >
> > > *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
> > > rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
> > > within the next few months*
> > >
> > > See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Otis
> > > --
> > > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message