Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9EF61092B for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34727 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2015 20:38:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 34652 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2015 20:38:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 34640 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2015 20:38:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:38:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.49] (HELO mail-qg0-f49.google.com) (209.85.192.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:38:18 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id q107so2993879qgd.8 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:37:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f6Njyypn0vtaoVi/dyRS/MVGEBGrY8+pKRoGhlHSivc=; b=fioK+Wd01ASX0llrhogh3o9pK9yilbCXq5n44/EhLot5c3n2c6luObAxNd+wNq3vXn tYPBvZFkze/gdCq/jQZnfywhfgq7vz+MJvVzPj2r4S1v6Fq8UgAVrhkHgqVecg22TLyW nIGKFO9VkCLh6kcaoVfvC3bGbgHUN18PxdR5H+RRiBCjnm9Cv+EJ9VaafMWy/1gAAjLw CjuFKbQSfSqUHo6nNe8pStFFQ0n/FRSjC2R7ppD7zvq1JseG2A2ncVz4I6l763w0T1xC vuQfzH+u6Enp+zo2dNHoBHgHUtyIM7DIfMNOOShDUK9V6fbTVBYiMdmAOC2sQjefejmE 14ig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.149.23 with SMTP id 23mr4367749qhv.10.1424291851919; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.155.201 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:37:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:37:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Region-level metrics being phased out? From: Otis Gospodnetic To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11376e64e3e763050f62c9cd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11376e64e3e763050f62c9cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Are Region-level metrics here to stay? I'm asking because I remember seeing an email or JIRA comment (from Stack?) from a fe wmonths ago about some Region-level metrics being removed.... ... maybe that was just for one specific Region-level metric, but in general Region-level metrics are here to stay, right? With more being added periodically? Thanks, Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ --001a11376e64e3e763050f62c9cd--