Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates
 209.85.192.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEo-6+QhnnoKYmaNK_rE8wkar6sSiA-0Rt7BZ_vD6PVuuGkiWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEo-6+QhnnoKYmaNK_rE8wkar6sSiA-0Rt7BZ_vD6PVuuGkiWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:07:05 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CADcMMgGis5vh-HzGhjAEZ=5Nkre4HwiM_6QAHOR=uoaUC4We1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Behavior of Split method in HBaseAdmin
From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
To: Hbase-User <user@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a6cf64636df050e48bbe8

--001a113a6cf64636df050e48bbe8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

See master log when split call comes in. It will say why the split did not
happen.
St.Ack

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Shahab Yunus <shahab.yunus@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If we programmatically split a table by async method in HBaseAdmin class
> and even after waiting for quite a while, the split does not happen (there
> is no difference in number of regions before and after the split call) and
> there is no error or an exception either, does it mean that there is
> something wrong or is there a valid scenario foe this behavior as well?
>
> I am providing the split point as well.
>
> Cdh5.3.0 is the version.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Shahab
>

--001a113a6cf64636df050e48bbe8--