Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 138C1107FF for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11884 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2015 05:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 11818 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2015 05:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 83806 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2015 04:54:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of alokob.be@gmail.com does not designate 162.253.133.43 as permitted sender) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:53:09 -0700 (MST) From: alokob To: user@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1423111989252-4068108.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1423033748598-4068066.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Hbase multiget vs scan with RowFilter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Ted for your reply. I was under impression that scan with RowFilter would give better performance as in case of multi-get each Get would be treated as an independent scan. Or you mean to say that in case scan it would be full table scan but in case of multi-get it would be return once we get the row without continuing to scan , so multi-get would be efficient. -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Hbase-multiget-vs-scan-with-RowFilter-tp4068066p4068108.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.