hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Esteban Gutierrez <este...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: 0.94 going forward
Date Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:37:35 GMT
Hi Lars,

Thanks for bringing this for discussion. From my experience I can tell that
0.94 is very stable but that shouldn't be a blocker to consider to EOL'ing.
Are you considering any specific timeframe for that?

thanks,
esteban.

--
Cloudera, Inc.


On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Koert Kuipers <koert@tresata.com> wrote:
>
> given that CDH4 is hbase 0.94 i dont believe nobody is using it. for our
> clients the majority is on 0.94 (versus 0.96 and up).
>
> so i am going with 1), its very stable!
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Over the past few months the rate of the change into 0.94 has slowed
> > significantly.
> > 0.94.25 was released on Nov 15th, and since then we had only 4 changes.
> >
> > This could mean two things: (1) 0.94 is very stable now or (2) nobody is
> > using it (at least nobody is contributing to it anymore).
> >
> >
> > If anybody out there is still using 0.94 and is not planning to upgrade
> to
> > 0.98 or later soon (which will required downtime), please speak up.
> > Otherwise it might be time to think about EOL'ing 0.94.
> >
> > It's not actually much work to do these releases, especially when they
> are
> > so small, but I'd like to continue only if they are actually used.
> > In any case, I am going to spin 0.94.26 with the current 4 fixes today or
> > tomorrow.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message