Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA6FA17F6D for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 02:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47622 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2014 02:08:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 47543 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2014 02:08:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 47530 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2014 02:08:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 02:08:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.173] (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 02:08:00 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id wn1so126991obc.32 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 18:06:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IhvvIox2lGpdObK4DyI1OryXKEHq6/pTr2m7svJlZH8=; b=jLOh9nzUKZGgVhGaS5b46+OtUABjRbwKU9AXBmGfH4jVBeopJlLSV6FM6nzLWR7yk/ UIGKnMKTyHVLEp/bVKFTn0R+d5f/0md2gr8ozl7KzxWASn3oe2ABA2Xj4jgdJcw6HWtV otuKWpQo0lvbdHrAOtsK8he+vOWSZ13QBTchuKDUAmgkVMUDUHkEOQQbjokPW7b5wMVC 4uVLDaUj10Yg5qrv3PNhP/lPr8+ZOmAYrMgsewmJN8Cz0Fgq3HGSJbvvazCPjY4OSFyK x94ygA2vjqiK4YL81D41STbnvdIyFfU3Oipc5WTo9SSOrrmXYSJ7ENVeeGalLC5+AoTM fiWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.102.37 with SMTP id fl5mr1048697obb.24.1415239570098; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 18:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.65.130 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:06:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:06:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Range or bulk delete From: Ted Yu To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149d172d924c2050727233c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0149d172d924c2050727233c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Please take a look at HBASE-8963. Cheers On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Kenneth Chan wrote: > Thanks. > > Related question is that is disabling and dropping a table efficient? > compared with deleting large number of rows (assuming number of rows to be > deleted is the same as number of rows in the table to be disabled and > dropped). Thanks! > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Please take a look > > at > > > hbase-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/example/BulkDeleteEndpoint.java > > > > Cheers > > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Kenneth Chan wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What's recommended/efficient way to delete large number of rows based > on > > > filter/query? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Kenneth > > > > > > --089e0149d172d924c2050727233c--