Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DB5B17572 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 07:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16722 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2014 07:31:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 16655 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2014 07:31:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 16641 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2014 07:31:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:31:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tianq01@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.173] (HELO mail-ig0-f173.google.com) (209.85.213.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:30:54 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id h18so414894igc.0 for ; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:30:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8Lt7NnZ3NJSAmmfzoKYkbp1AC5JB9K0Um6F3CYJiUhg=; b=Gc1U84VOAJmjRi9cSSmIryFHw+hOERjOvjtVOeKB6rC+xEEfqrjKHH/AokilRacQZ6 LeOmwjriyEybiuI8jH7U00sEA8KmPKc9WkTuIyAK+2wAeBbFcHkHeOEZ3ZQqU28slOVk jDII3PSfIi8n2qcOa9AsbaPTTunEhmh7trGTmrPiETbcegUjTWVQvuLhGH3DPuNvWn71 CAJ9+FRvYXUwSbBmyHYP1I+e5yZZyN2uwUsNNg7aAYzvbxW/3vQFI47SMmqoCVc9ZGWi IOM3aH2U6PGVr/U4kka6qdAaOR+N7+vYcUWyS8KljRZH950F11e7yOXqprB8slp15R3w iS6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.70.11 with SMTP id d11mr665836icj.92.1412321452430; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.19.133 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Oct 2014 00:30:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:30:52 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to make a given table spread evenly across the cluster From: Qiang Tian To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba2122c17b1bfc05047fb625 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba2122c17b1bfc05047fb625 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 according to the 2 pictures, looks the balancer not run? On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > See also > HBASE-12139 StochasticLoadBalancer doesn't work on large lightly loaded > clusters > > Cheers > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: > > > Also, What is the balancer configured on your cluster? Which HBase > version? > > If you have a 200 region table in a cluster with another pretty small 13 > > region table like the one you have, chances are high for this 2nd table > to > > not be perfectly balanced over the cluster compared to the first one. > > > > JM > > > > 2014-10-02 13:30 GMT-04:00 Nick Dimiduk : > > > > > Is the balancer running? If it's running but unable to act, you should > > see > > > some explanation in the Master logs. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Tao Xiao > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have a HBase table containing 40 million records. Checking HBase > UI, > > I > > > > could see that this table was not spread evenly across the cluster. > Two > > > > nodes, *ec1.hadoop.com:60020 * and > > > > *ec5.hadoop.com:60020 > > > > *, for example, has only one region > each, > > > > while other nodes have more regions. Here is the screen shot > > > > . > > > > > > > > I tried to split that table by clicking the button "Split". Later, > each > > > > region of that table was split into two regions, but all regions for > > that > > > > table as a whole were still unevenly spread across the cluster. Here > > > > is a screen > > > > shot after I click the button "Split" > > > > . > > > > > > > > So I'd like to know how to adjust the regions for a table so that all > > > > regions for that table can be evenly spread across the cluster. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > --90e6ba2122c17b1bfc05047fb625--