Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0643817702 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 22:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69779 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2014 22:12:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 69706 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2014 22:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 69695 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2014 22:12:55 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 22:12:55 +0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id E53F61A068C for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 22:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w7so31112lbi.36 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:12:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.151.99 with SMTP id up3mr1414413lbb.45.1412287971897; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:12:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.160.206 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:12:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <143610f68d4e442fbe2b86d48f087045@CO1PR06MB109.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <44ac8abd2a6848f383dec25c68b65571@CO1PR06MB109.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> From: Andrew Purtell Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:12:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Recovering hbase after a failure To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33dcb2e2b6e4050477eaf3 --047d7b33dcb2e2b6e4050477eaf3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Esteban Gutierrez wrote: > Another possibility is that we could > live with createNonRecursive until FileSystem becomes fully deprecated an= d > =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B > we can migrate to FileContext, perhaps for HBase 3.x? > =E2=80=8BSure=E2=80=8B > HBASE-11045 goes in > the opposite direction to this but the discussion is in essence the same > problem. > Yes. Although I don't read it as going in the opposite direction. I read it as coming to the conclusion that there is no good alternative to createNonRecursive, which we need. Perhaps someone working with colleagues who have HDFS commit privileges can work out something suitable. --=20 Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --047d7b33dcb2e2b6e4050477eaf3--