hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lars George <lars.geo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Thrift-vs-Thrift2
Date Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:40:04 GMT
We had others report their use earlier (previous thread about removing it).
So it is definitely in use. But... I agree it needs to be completed. I know
I have been tardy on this and need to speed up. :( Darn work always comes
in between.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
wrote:

> Survey: Is anyone using the Thrift 2 interface?
>
> Not here.
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Kiran Kumar.M.R <
> Kiran.Kumar.MR@huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> Our customers were using Hbase-0.94 through thrift1 (C++ clients).
> >> Now HBase is getting upgraded to 0.98.x
> >>
> >> I see that thrift2 development is going on (
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8818)
> >>
> >
> > It has stalled with quite a while now.
> >
> >
> >
> >> Customers are interested in continuing to use thrift1 as they are not
> >> interested in new capability given in thrift2 and also minimize their
> >> application changes as much as possible.
> >>
> >> What should be our direction in using thrift interface?
> >>
> >> -        Shall we continue to use thrift1? (Will this continue to be
> >> supported, I see some mail threads on making it deprecated)
> >>
> >>
> > IMO this would be safest.
> >
> >
> >
> >> -        Or suggest our customers to switch to thrift2?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Unless anyone is interested in seeing through the thrift2 project to the
> > finish, I think we should just purge it from the codebase and stay
> thrift1.
> >
> > St.Ack
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message