Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 505CF1152F for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63351 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2014 21:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 63273 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2014 21:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 63262 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2014 21:20:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:20:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of abhishek1015@gmail.com does not designate 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:20:10 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1X9Kzu-00042J-6u for user@hbase.apache.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:19:50 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:19:50 -0700 (PDT) From: abhishek1015 To: user@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: <1405977590187-4061748.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: insert latency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello everyone, I have a two node hbase cluster with each node running a data-node and a region-server. I am running YCSB benchmark on this cluster. I have these two counter-intuitive following interesting observation which I could not explain. Hoping someone could help understand these behavior. Experiment 1: a) Write Only - 100% insert workload vs b) Write heavy - 90 % insert and 10% read Observation: While average insert latency for write heavy is around 15 us, the average insert latency is about 70x to 120x more for Write only operations Experiment 2: c) Write only workload with default compaction scheme, vs d) Write only workload with major and minor compaction off Observation: While less data is written for compaction off, the insert latency is lesser for default setting. Thanks for any help. Abhishek -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/insert-latency-tp4061748.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.