hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is there an advantage of placing related regions on the same region server/host?
Date Sun, 13 Jul 2014 22:59:59 GMT
By related regions, do you mean query would typically involve both regions ?

Cheers

On Jul 13, 2014, at 2:54 PM, gomes <sankarmail@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have few tables, and I have pre partitioned the tables. I would like to
> achieve reduced latency. I am just thinking of placing related regions on
> the same region server/host. For example, table 1 contains 3 regions
> [a,b,c], and table 2 contains 3 regions[x,y,z]. (a,x) contains the data for
> some group of users, (b,y) contains the data for some group of users, and
> (c,z) and so on. 
> 
> If I have two region servers, instead of placing [a,b,c] on one server, and
> [x,y,z] on other server, is there an advantage of placing related regions
> (a,x), (b,y), (c,z) among the region servers?
> 
> Note: I also make sure the regions will not be divided further, or there
> will be manual intervention needed to divide the regions further.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-an-advantage-of-placing-related-regions-on-the-same-region-server-host-tp4061296.html
> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message