Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1403898734355-4060823.post@n3.nabble.com>
References: <1403898734355-4060823.post@n3.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:57:33 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62xF1+2DzxUt8ZnrH-CfmjKEv723vzcAxQ_xOVf5q+ZgTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HBase Disabled Table Resource Consumption?
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01633c625cb29404fcd6b8e1

--089e01633c625cb29404fcd6b8e1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

bq. Will it affect hbase region server block cache

No.

bq. adding up may go beyond 200 per region server?

I don't think this is a problem.

Cheers


On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Parkirat <parkiratbigdata@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a table with many regions and huge data, which I have disabled, as I
> may not need it anymore.
>
> Could anybody tell me, how would such a table(lying idle) will affect my
> cluster resources? Assuming I dont have any problems with hard disk or dfs
> space and namenode block counts.
>
> Will it affect hbase region server block cache or hbase write/read
> performance in any way?
>
> Or will it affect if regions from other tables increase over time and
> regions from this disabled table adding up may go beyond 200 per region
> server?
>
> Regards,
> Parkirat Singh Bagga.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/HBase-Disabled-Table-Resource-Consumption-tp4060823.html
> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--089e01633c625cb29404fcd6b8e1--