Return-Path: 
 <user-return-43100-apmail-hbase-user-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AFD411859
	for <apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 12 May 2014 23:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 66736 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2014 20:36:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66589 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2014 20:36:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66573 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2014 20:36:33 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:36:33 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of enis.soz@gmail.com designates
 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yh0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:36:29 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a41so4545485yho.21
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=qFRow+X9NZ0UKXJvrt1PXKw9Sv4kz7lPCZlCMk/O4TM=;
        b=mGnIIomD+aNmJ2jQ4MhAeyUQorufaT+Ile1xHcJp6wC8bTUhdQP6Kn8wVIMWGqe/+9
         y1gcO/R4epaMBJ8WAmAyjd3VPDyTaCzDHBwFb6Mt6krmLZbwSrfOIK5YaRua2fOmWfia
         v6DnEnaLAtWmtK5dO5C9Jc4FOKtHwkywEBofj4IyPmWM8Go/2UE+Ao5vlfxLT6NEbWoE
         /Q9vIuJ5O64haW3G/1R0dgt5tGX0ms/CSNlVH0AnkTzS/lM6N9XDWUMgR73Skllpv+YR
         +GEfq4w3BagI0B7H4zAYuY4UPkOT+dcA7o6tTaZSJxQkYr7H8oOcLmcne+bFD/EQkHOL
         kxlg==
X-Received: by 10.236.87.139 with SMTP id y11mr44741201yhe.27.1399926968484;
 Mon, 12 May 2014 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.208.206 with HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADcMMgHQqs=uSKZiEH6H-h2nEFEHmUK05M=EGOrtroLL4kjodw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+RK=_BYWs65yWD+LxhEor7iU9i1DdtnpCx+G8JGRWOyY-T7Jg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_CE1faLO=2ucYf=cQBfg1BTM60Dk=NM6gj79s1F5=Fgww@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_C2U0tGym1FR+3NL0kG8WO14zm-2N+CWNWKFEUkzwRQbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADY20s6pb5DA7KZ_GLJEtpgctxqwLF=mc54kx0ENqcLsyF_e5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <D662AE61-B45C-404A-B6F3-D217DD5A110E@gmail.com>
 <D53C88E3-9D07-41D3-9537-4900279653FF@gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgHQqs=uSKZiEH6H-h2nEFEHmUK05M=EGOrtroLL4kjodw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Enis_S=C3=B6ztutar?= <enis.soz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 20:35:48 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAMUu0w8fKTQ_z+5yW5OdJg5fsYfDO-UAhsW8uezGcEeVcm_peA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301b63e9ab25e604f939e54b
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--20cf301b63e9ab25e604f939e54b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Sorry I could not get on this sooner. I do typically run a list of tests
from my checklist to verify the release, which is why I sometimes do not
vote on releases. Let me do the dutiful for this.

Agreed with the general sentiment. Please reconsider.

Enis


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective immediately.
> >
> >
> Please reconsider.  Innocent mistake.
>
>
>
> > I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release
> sufficiently
> > that not even simple package verification is time worth spending.
> >
> >
> As a community we are notoriously bad at voting on releases.  Last week was
> particularly distracting (hbasecon, hackathon, mail outage).
>
> St.Ack
>

--20cf301b63e9ab25e604f939e54b--