Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 894D211BE2 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62850 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2014 14:19:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 62779 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2014 14:19:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 62771 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2014 14:19:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:19:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chandralakshmikant90@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.49] (HELO mail-yh0-f49.google.com) (209.85.213.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:19:22 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c41so5408728yho.22 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 07:19:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MWy1uB/BGEC3UlN7wZM8Z9sIPqNbSWk6QWAEc4PtI3w=; b=Zd8NSqt8aAmGtMYXVtyraDOVBUVBryx3Ag/WrWxImvIklKaYIBvgMpnUVUFi6kNvOc 7lMIOgNwAla5BgkqkDs+qIMnDkCT+fx1cbC/q/oV0co83AJgX0puXiSF9bv6yjsNSfnI k6MG2aDzq5Ch/cAMogMTQc/NDUjA6t/48Lg5LTk64lq2cF4QHnyAJYb8ya2YZ0DNqljR D9ZpJj0MfNVyY6DU34YCaoZHD/SjwtbAo6q7U7FrUa/sG+/9TrPIHoDPSQgtJfyArO/j vvOtEaU7fefc5BZoqjZzumsT/IYhEsgrsgWhZYWhFR4jNwxl2uacnKIcEcWZSpfD21mm WJPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.4.225 with SMTP id 61mr34380549yhj.108.1399817941566; Sun, 11 May 2014 07:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.170.222.215 with HTTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 07:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 19:49:01 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: speed of replication for under replicated blocks by namenode From: chandra kant To: "user@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc12a28490c04f920837f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013cc12a28490c04f920837f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Some of my blocks are under replicated. Can anybody tell me at what speed namenode replicates it so that dfs.replication factor is satisfied and blocks become normal again? Or does it solely depend upon load factor on namenode and it can't be measured accurately? thanx Chandra --089e013cc12a28490c04f920837f--