hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available
Date Mon, 12 May 2014 23:40:07 GMT
To be frank I am mortified at the basic mistake on voting, and the all
around dumb stuff I managed to pull off this time around. But I do feel bad
about dropping 0.98, was up all night etc, so I humbly reconsider if you'll
allow it, and I promise to do a better job.


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:01 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:

> Getting folks test releases is like pulling teeths, or herding cats, or
> getting three kids to agree which song from Frozen is the best :)
>
> All jokes aside, this *is* a problem. With the goal of more frequent
> releases release verification needs to be a smooth process.
> I do not know how to fix it, but if we all could just remember to test a
> release (and a simple verification does not take much time) that'd help.
>
> I take some of the blame. And I'll weasel an excuse: HBaseCon. :)
>
> Please reconsider Andy. It's not always fun, but it's important service to
> the community.
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is
> available
>
>
> Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective immediately.
>
> I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release sufficiently
> that not even simple package verification is time worth spending.
>
>
> > On May 12, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Too late I already put out the artifacts. I thought the release vote is
> lazy consensus. If you would like me to resign as RM for 0.98 I will.
> >
> >> On May 12, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Andrew,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least
> >> three +1 votes from PMC members[1]. Perhaps people were a bit busy last
> >> week due to HBaseCon and we should extend the voting on this release
> >> candidate for another week?
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> -Todd
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> With one +1 and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote has passed. I have sent the
> >>> artifacts onward for mirroring and will announce in ~24 hours.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs on Java 6u43,
> 7u45,
> >>>> and 8u0.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, and YCSB.
> >>>>
> >>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
> >>>> 0.98.2 indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@titled
> >>>> "Comparing the performance of 0.98.2 RC0 and 0.98.0 using YCSB".
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> download
> >>> at
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.2RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> are
> >>>>> also available in the temporary repository
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1020.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326505
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
Time
> >>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on May 7 on whether or not we should release this
> as
> >>>>> 0.98.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ​    - Andy​
> >>>>> ​
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >>>>> (via Tom White)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>>  - Andy
> >>>>
> >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >>>> (via Tom White)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>>  - Andy
> >>>
> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >>> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Todd Lipcon
> >> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message