Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1C9E1066D for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67719 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2014 09:59:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 67089 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2014 09:59:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 67073 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2014 09:59:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:59:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anoop.hbase@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.177] (HELO mail-lb0-f177.google.com) (209.85.217.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:59:44 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z11so1112478lbi.22 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:59:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=COe88xOtmfmxDxE5ET/7MNTO2C7ZqevMX48YqGr574U=; b=gxbT+tWXoXxDXzfd1nlJaUQZzeGKtd8htIHgJTuWNVZ/xOdQfFzZoSmcebaW5QL4LY ITEYkhDuc5ql8GwYjfhB9AhmIha744/00ElzIQxgQ10KFmMZQhtwBeakDP9TUZ01AX82 lmFsC2hWTJ9lgECTT+y2RsKrOWhezQUmzqOo7ddftUt+fkKuxyeF+fha98VIDyTh6O9C uein1SIjGEglouBWc2tkzcXRxA9/isAxNqnRV9Ip5caSrupHGwbfw6AZqeCOJRnOuGZT nZpuQlhMpe7BVd/jdQmqhWW7Kfh3QT/Izok3JikbLLdcsZKc6uj/VLEiFVCQimKtjRH2 oacw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.186.98 with SMTP id fj2mr602590lbc.54.1396519162329; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.62.165 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 02:59:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References:

Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:29:22 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download From: Anoop John To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136194297bf5504f620744d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1136194297bf5504f620744d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is already committed. So if we have a new RC, this issue also will get in. -Anoop- On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Fabien LE GALLO wrote: > Can we also include HBASE-10848 in 0.98.1 ? > This is another issue related to filters, not as critical as HBASE-10850 > but it would be great to have it in this release. > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > I agree with Anoop's assessment. > > > > Cheers > > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John wrote: > > > > > After analysing HBASE-10850 I think better we can fix this in 98.1 > > release > > > itself. Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses essential > CF > > > optimization. > > > > > > Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case, > > > > > > Considering those we need a new RC. > > > > > > -Anoop- > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > > > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 on the RC. > > >> Checked the signature. > > >> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases. > > >> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels. Everything > looks > > >> fine. > > >> Compaction, flushes etc too. > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> Ram > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> Checked the hash > > >>> Checked the tar layout. > > >>> Played with a single node. Everything seemed good after ITBLL > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> The hash is good. Doc. and layout looks good. UI seems fine. > > >>>> > > >>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip of > > >> the > > >>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster. Seems to basically work (small big > linked > > >>> list > > >>>> test worked). > > >>>> > > >>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC. > > >>>> > > >>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is too > > >>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal rig > > >>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been passing > > >> green > > >>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours. > > >>>> > > >>>> St.Ack > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell < > apurtell@apache.org > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for > > >> download > > >>> at > > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven artifacts > > >> are > > >>>> also > > >>>>> available in the temporary repository > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific > Time > > >>>> (00:00 > > >>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - Andy > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > >>> Hein > > >>>>> (via Tom White) > > >> > > > > > > -- > Fabien Le Gallo > * Software Engineer * * , * * Capptain * > ------------------------------ > * e. * flegallo@capptain.com > * w. * http://www.capptain.com > * a. * 18 rue Tronchet, 75008 Paris, France > < > https://www.facebook.com/capptain?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature > > > < > https://twitter.com/capptain_hq?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature > > > < > http://www.capptain.com/feed/?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature > > > < > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDowgVp4zmA?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature > > > 4 Tips to Market Your App > < > http://www.capptain.com/2014/03/26/4-tips-for-marketing-your-app/?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature > > > > < > http://www.capptain.com/contact/?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature > > > IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you > have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately > and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof. > --001a1136194297bf5504f620744d--