Return-Path: 
 <user-return-42608-apmail-hbase-user-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66B5710C95
	for <apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue,  8 Apr 2014 13:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 12564 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2014 13:29:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12507 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2014 13:29:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12494 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2014 13:29:24 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:29:24 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of beatls@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.169] (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com)
 (209.85.220.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:29:18 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ik5so775005vcb.0
        for <user@hbase.apache.org>; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 06:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=r0azRur3UbZnK8eBlwdNoSvA6VuRe1YgkBr5YJVhWCk=;
        b=iklfduFHAV4MRk+cZRI7kM972GXaEQTQwaeSHGKlJbMklCn9AkfqhvHLcPd8TN8/NT
         fBC+neo27RNLcJjyiJPPpY12/3sbYLAxNfcjhOW2FrIBN4DAyatVW+zdatYg3m7R/X1E
         VmTSXBSm2MxTI7reBUUnV29bKpii3oUKso/+gA3xJ6IJ9yZoWNp1iFcFr99BqAfdqg32
         B1Jgznh1inwXNZPtsUxQ1mjDIAZOmE5i6LD8JLZSVp+4rlZvwOBzg2Eu82/S2zpbV1S4
         tj4/0kr+z7XyfjAFpNLKd/nPatohQAz3oWKexkbFcnnL5zbz46OzVQGaiCqRr8NpizMx
         rmjw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.12.66 with SMTP id w2mr3207133vcw.15.1396963736629; Tue,
 08 Apr 2014 06:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.187.129 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 06:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1E055939-32E2-4AA4-8EA9-4DC5FC6E859C@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGyVJ6KdB4i5a1y=mhhRJZ99b32VZzqw6jA9A233AQhZh_Stsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1E055939-32E2-4AA4-8EA9-4DC5FC6E859C@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:28:56 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAGyVJ6L-jNfwqR+Jgoe6E1E6y-ZmFE2E7o1Tt2QxLJ81+WFNwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: is hbase 0.97 64 bit or 32 bit?
From: hua beatls <beatls@gmail.com>
To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3150049394c04f687f75e
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a11c3150049394c04f687f75e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

it is 0.96.2


thanks!

beatls


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can you clarify which hbase release you're looking at ?
>
> The latest release for 0.96 was 0.96.2
>
> Latest release for 0.98 was 0.98.1
>
> Cheers
>
> On Apr 8, 2014, at 6:55 AM, hua beatls <beatls@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > is hbase 0.97 support 64 bit? or should complied from 32 bit to 64 bit?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > beatls
>

--001a11c3150049394c04f687f75e--