hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
Date Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:13:02 GMT
James:
HBASE-10850 is not just about SingleColumnValueFilter. See Anoop's comment:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10850?focusedCommentId=13958668&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13958668

The test case Fabien provided uses SingleColumnValueFilter but the defect
has deeper implication beyond making SingleColumnValueFilter unusable in
certain scenarios.

I am find with giving the next RC a bit shorter voting period.

Cheers


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM, James Taylor <jtaylor@salesforce.com> wrote:

> I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release it
> can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so it
> seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these
> additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]?
>
>     James
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ram
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Understood, Andy.
> > >
> > > I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1
> > > vote
> > > > and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take
> > the
> > > > time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file
> > > > blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1.
> > > >  0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release.
> > > >
> > > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with Anoop's assessment.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> After analysing HBASE-10850  I think better we can fix this in
> 98.1
> > > > release
> > > > >> itself.  Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses
> > essential
> > > > CF
> > > > >> optimization.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Considering those we need a new RC.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Anoop-
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > > > >> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> +1 on the RC.
> > > > >>> Checked the signature.
> > > > >>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
> > > > >>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels.  Everything
> > > looks
> > > > >>> fine.
> > > > >>> Compaction, flushes etc too.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Regards
> > > > >>> Ram
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <
> eclark@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> +1
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Checked the hash
> > > > >>>> Checked the tar layout.
> > > > >>>> Played with a single node.  Everything seemed good after
ITBLL
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> +1
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The hash is good.  Doc. and layout looks good.  UI
seems fine.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase
against a
> tip
> > > of
> > > > >>> the
> > > > >>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems to basically work
(small big
> > > linked
> > > > >>>> list
> > > > >>>>> test worked).
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but
in case he is
> > too
> > > > >>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten
our
> internal
> > > rig
> > > > >>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it
has been
> > passing
> > > > >>> green
> > > > >>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> St.Ack
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell
<
> > > > apurtell@apache.org
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3)
is available for
> > > > >>> download
> > > > >>>> at
> > > > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/
and Maven
> > artifacts
> > > > >>> are
> > > > >>>>> also
> > > > >>>>>> available in the temporary repository
> > > > >>>
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found
here:
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by
midnight
> Pacific
> > > Time
> > > > >>>>> (00:00
> > > > >>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release
this as
> > > 0.98.1.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>> Best regards,
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>  - Andy
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by
hitting back. -
> > > Piet
> > > > >>>> Hein
> > > > >>>>>> (via Tom White)
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message