hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
Date Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:30:11 GMT
(cc dev@)


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> Thank you, the release of 0.98.1 will happen on time unless there is a new
> development.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:23 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 on getting this RC3 out as the release and targetting the bug for
>> 0.98.2.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ram
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >Phoenix 4.0 has no release it can currently run on
>> > >Can't we get these additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away
>> >
>> > I was thinking that for Phoenix 4.0 *release* the 98.1 is needed..
>>  Thats
>> > why was in favor of correcting the bug in 98.1 itself..  Ya 98.2 can
>> come
>> > out in a month time and at that time 4.0 can upgrade to that..  Sounds
>> > good.. I am ready to again cast my +1 for this RC.
>> >
>> >
>> > >@Anoop - would you mind verifying whether or not
>> > the TestSCVFWithMiniCluster written as a Phoenix query returns the
>> correct
>> > results?
>> >
>> > I will check this James..  I think it might be there.  Any way, even if
>> the
>> > bug is there, there can be a work around solution in Phoenix filter code
>> > which I can try out  (If you would like to get)
>> >
>> > -Anoop-
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > That is a feasible option.
>> > >
>> > > I have changed Fix Version of HBASE-10850 to 0.98.2
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > To be fair, Phoenix should not have relied on an unreleased
>> dependency.
>> > > (I
>> > > > know there are corporate timing issues, but they really should not
>> > force
>> > > us
>> > > > into situations like these).
>> > > >
>> > > > As far as I understand the issue, it not just a performance but can
>> > lead
>> > > > to incorrect results.
>> > > >
>> > > > Then again, this issue has existed in all of 0.96 and 0.98 so far
>> > (over 5
>> > > > months).
>> > > >
>> > > > So, I'd be in favor of releasing 0.98.1 now, and doing 0.98.2 soon,
>> in
>> > 14
>> > > > or 20 days (that would also pull back some of the time lost in the
>> > > 0.98.1RC
>> > > > cycle).
>> > > >
>> > > > -- Lars
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ________________________________
>> > > >  From: James Taylor <jtaylor@salesforce.com>
>> > > > To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
>> > > > Cc: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
>> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 8:57 AM
>> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is
>> > > > available for download
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no
>> release
>> > it
>> > > > can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter,
>> so
>> > it
>> > > > seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these
>> > > > additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]?
>> > > >
>> > > >     James
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
>> > > > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards
>> > > > > Ram
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Understood, Andy.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Cheers
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <
>> > > > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > However, I may very well release the next RC even if
I am the
>> > only
>> > > +1
>> > > > > > vote
>> > > > > > > and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire.
So
>> please
>> > > take
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98
branch
>> or
>> > > file
>> > > > > > > blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This
is it for
>> > > 0.98.1.
>> > > > > > >  0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1
release.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I agree with Anoop's assessment.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Cheers
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <
>> anoop.hbase@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> After analysing HBASE-10850  I think better
we can fix
>> this in
>> > > > 98.1
>> > > > > > > release
>> > > > > > > >> itself.  Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1
and Phoenix
>> uses
>> > > > > essential
>> > > > > > > CF
>> > > > > > > >> optimization.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in
such a case,
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Considering those we need a new RC.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> -Anoop-
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna
vasudevan <
>> > > > > > > >> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>> +1 on the RC.
>> > > > > > > >>> Checked the signature.
>> > > > > > > >>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the
testcases.
>> > > > > > > >>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility
labels.
>> > >  Everything
>> > > > > > looks
>> > > > > > > >>> fine.
>> > > > > > > >>> Compaction, flushes etc too.
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> Regards
>> > > > > > > >>> Ram
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott
Clark <
>> > > > eclark@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>> +1
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>> Checked the hash
>> > > > > > > >>>> Checked the tar layout.
>> > > > > > > >>>> Played with a single node.  Everything
seemed good after
>> > ITBLL
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM,
Stack <
>> stack@duboce.net>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> +1
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> The hash is good.  Doc. and layout
looks good.  UI seems
>> > > fine.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default
hadoop 2.2 in hbase
>> > against a
>> > > > tip
>> > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > >>> the
>> > > > > > > >>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems
to basically work
>> (small
>> > > big
>> > > > > > linked
>> > > > > > > >>>> list
>> > > > > > > >>>>> test worked).
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against
this RC.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our
Jon's thunder but in
>> case
>> > he
>> > > is
>> > > > > too
>> > > > > > > >>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note
that he has gotten our
>> > > > internal
>> > > > > > rig
>> > > > > > > >>>>> running against the tip of the
0.98 branch and it has
>> been
>> > > > > passing
>> > > > > > > >>> green
>> > > > > > > >>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster
over hours.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> St.Ack
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49
AM, Andrew Purtell <
>> > > > > > > apurtell@apache.org
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release
candidate (RC3) is
>> available
>> > > for
>> > > > > > > >>> download
>> > > > > > > >>>> at
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/
and
>> Maven
>> > > > > artifacts
>> > > > > > > >>> are
>> > > > > > > >>>>> also
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> available in the temporary
repository
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > >
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Signed with my code signing
key D5365CCD.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> The issues resolved in this
release can be found here:
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Please try out the candidate
and vote +1/-1 by midnight
>> > > > Pacific
>> > > > > > Time
>> > > > > > > >>>>> (00:00
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether
or not we should release
>> this
>> > as
>> > > > > > 0.98.1.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> --
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Best regards,
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>  - Andy
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack
prove their worth by hitting
>> > > back. -
>> > > > > > Piet
>> > > > > > > >>>> Hein
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> (via Tom White)
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message