hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
Date Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:29:47 GMT
Thank you, the release of 0.98.1 will happen on time unless there is a new
development.


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:23 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on getting this RC3 out as the release and targetting the bug for
> 0.98.2.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Phoenix 4.0 has no release it can currently run on
> > >Can't we get these additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away
> >
> > I was thinking that for Phoenix 4.0 *release* the 98.1 is needed..  Thats
> > why was in favor of correcting the bug in 98.1 itself..  Ya 98.2 can come
> > out in a month time and at that time 4.0 can upgrade to that..  Sounds
> > good.. I am ready to again cast my +1 for this RC.
> >
> >
> > >@Anoop - would you mind verifying whether or not
> > the TestSCVFWithMiniCluster written as a Phoenix query returns the
> correct
> > results?
> >
> > I will check this James..  I think it might be there.  Any way, even if
> the
> > bug is there, there can be a work around solution in Phoenix filter code
> > which I can try out  (If you would like to get)
> >
> > -Anoop-
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > That is a feasible option.
> > >
> > > I have changed Fix Version of HBASE-10850 to 0.98.2
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > To be fair, Phoenix should not have relied on an unreleased
> dependency.
> > > (I
> > > > know there are corporate timing issues, but they really should not
> > force
> > > us
> > > > into situations like these).
> > > >
> > > > As far as I understand the issue, it not just a performance but can
> > lead
> > > > to incorrect results.
> > > >
> > > > Then again, this issue has existed in all of 0.96 and 0.98 so far
> > (over 5
> > > > months).
> > > >
> > > > So, I'd be in favor of releasing 0.98.1 now, and doing 0.98.2 soon,
> in
> > 14
> > > > or 20 days (that would also pull back some of the time lost in the
> > > 0.98.1RC
> > > > cycle).
> > > >
> > > > -- Lars
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >  From: James Taylor <jtaylor@salesforce.com>
> > > > To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
> > > > Cc: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 8:57 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is
> > > > available for download
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release
> > it
> > > > can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so
> > it
> > > > seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these
> > > > additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]?
> > > >
> > > >     James
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > > > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Ram
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Understood, Andy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, I may very well release the next RC even if I
am the
> > only
> > > +1
> > > > > > vote
> > > > > > > and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So
please
> > > take
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98
branch
> or
> > > file
> > > > > > > blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it
for
> > > 0.98.1.
> > > > > > >  0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I agree with Anoop's assessment.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <
> anoop.hbase@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> After analysing HBASE-10850  I think better we
can fix this
> in
> > > > 98.1
> > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > >> itself.  Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and
Phoenix uses
> > > > > essential
> > > > > > > CF
> > > > > > > >> optimization.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such
a case,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Considering those we need a new RC.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> -Anoop-
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan
<
> > > > > > > >> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> +1 on the RC.
> > > > > > > >>> Checked the signature.
> > > > > > > >>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
> > > > > > > >>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility
labels.
> > >  Everything
> > > > > > looks
> > > > > > > >>> fine.
> > > > > > > >>> Compaction, flushes etc too.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Regards
> > > > > > > >>> Ram
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott
Clark <
> > > > eclark@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> +1
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Checked the hash
> > > > > > > >>>> Checked the tar layout.
> > > > > > > >>>> Played with a single node.  Everything
seemed good after
> > ITBLL
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack
<stack@duboce.net
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> +1
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> The hash is good.  Doc. and layout
looks good.  UI seems
> > > fine.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop
2.2 in hbase
> > against a
> > > > tip
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > >>> the
> > > > > > > >>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems
to basically work
> (small
> > > big
> > > > > > linked
> > > > > > > >>>> list
> > > > > > > >>>>> test worked).
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this
RC.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's
thunder but in case
> > he
> > > is
> > > > > too
> > > > > > > >>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that
he has gotten our
> > > > internal
> > > > > > rig
> > > > > > > >>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98
branch and it has
> been
> > > > > passing
> > > > > > > >>> green
> > > > > > > >>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster
over hours.
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> St.Ack
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM,
Andrew Purtell <
> > > > > > > apurtell@apache.org
> > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate
(RC3) is
> available
> > > for
> > > > > > > >>> download
> > > > > > > >>>> at
> > > > > > > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/
and Maven
> > > > > artifacts
> > > > > > > >>> are
> > > > > > > >>>>> also
> > > > > > > >>>>>> available in the temporary repository
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key
D5365CCD.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> The issues resolved in this release
can be found here:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Please try out the candidate and
vote +1/-1 by midnight
> > > > Pacific
> > > > > > Time
> > > > > > > >>>>> (00:00
> > > > > > > >>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or
not we should release this
> > as
> > > > > > 0.98.1.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Best regards,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>  - Andy
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove
their worth by hitting
> > > back. -
> > > > > > Piet
> > > > > > > >>>> Hein
> > > > > > > >>>>>> (via Tom White)
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message