Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=hQbSHRvTSmYkgaznaEETH4XqjGzMA8ydpVJW239y0R+CJsOEeRQWb29oQb3nIj/9v6euOj9JiNshhgA/d2QOKmwZptbdMnTA4ZYZw1p9/gGD4zaSPp+OMWA4n22/dHV1x+K2Bj8K/r1Taqw/pOXwPvcfwc6X/OCmHQuV8ibLbQg=;
References: 
 <CAOiuM-41Rc_5zSQpazD55xStyTmN4EHB0a5-7Q0cEpc+xZHWZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1391557892.33836.YahooMailNeo@web140604.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:51:32 -0800 (PST)
From: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
Reply-To: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Building HBase RPM
To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOiuM-41Rc_5zSQpazD55xStyTmN4EHB0a5-7Q0cEpc+xZHWZQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Do you feel up to creating an RPM spec for 0.96 and later?
If so, I don't think anybody would be opposed to committing into dev-support or something.

-- Lars


----- Original Message -----
From: Ishan Chhabra <ichhabra@rocketfuel.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Cc: 
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 2:26 PM
Subject: Building HBase RPM

Hi,
We do a rpm based deploy to centos servers. HBase till 0.94 used to have a
functional rpm spec and a rpm profile, but looks like it is gone from 0.96
onwards.

Was this removed intentionally? Is there now another way to build rpms?

-- 
*Ishan Chhabra *| Rocket Scientist | RocketFuel Inc.