hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: 0.92 => 0.96 in one go?
Date Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:27:58 GMT
You should go to hadoop2 for sure.

I did this on a small cluster:

Installed a 0.92.2 on a hadoop 1.2.1.
Loaded a bit of data, 20 odd regions or so.
Shutdown hbase.
Installed hbase 0.98.0-hadoop1 RC0
Followed the upgrade instructions in the manual for 0.96 ensuring no
hfilev1 (as Matteo)
Started hbase-0.98.0.  Looked fine.
Loaded more data.
Shut it all down.
Upgrade hadoop from 1 to 2 (I had some fun because hadoop1 and hadoop2
configs had data and name dirs in different locations)
Installed hbase-0.98.0-hadoop2 everywhere
Started it up.
Started loading more data.

Seems fine looking in logs.

You can use my fedex account sending the first born Otis.  Will hang on
wall beside all the others.

St.Ack



On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My pinky is much less demanding than my first born...I suggest you rethink
> your choice...
>
> If we have to upgrade to Hadoop 2, or if that is recommended, then yes,
> we'd upgrade to Hadoop 2.
>
> Otis
> --
> Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > What Kevin O' Dell said.
> >
> > Let me try incorporate as part of 0.98 testing start of next week (You'll
> > upgrade your hadoop too Otis from 1->2?).
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Kevin O'dell <kevin.odell@cloudera.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Just your first born
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> > > otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > You've got that much time!?  I mean, sure, sure, but how much is that
> > > going
> > > > to cost me?  A pinky?
> > > >
> > > > Otis
> > > > --
> > > > Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
> > > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Want me to try it for you Otis w/ artificial data? (Usual
> > > disclaimers...)
> > > > > St.Ack
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> > > > > otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It looks like going from 0.96 to 0.98 should be relatively easy,
> > > which
> > > > is
> > > > > > great.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are on 0.92 and I'm wondering if it's possible do the 0.92
==>
> > > 0.96
> > > > > jump
> > > > > > without making two jumps: 0.92 ==> 0.94 and then 0.94. ==>
0.96 ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Otis
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
> > > > > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin O'Dell
> > > Systems Engineer, Cloudera
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message