Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of haosdent@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3db73bcb.3b78c.1436b862088.Coremail.leixf@ihep.ac.cn>
References: <3db73bcb.3b78c.1436b862088.Coremail.leixf@ihep.ac.cn>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:28:43 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAFt=ROOWN2wRbFjRNBOeyycYNZoKqa7YuREEMK5DY7Q-txHFbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: hbase read performance tuning failed
From: Haosong Huang <haosdent@gmail.com>
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e015369f062002304ef608469

--089e015369f062002304ef608469
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>but the scan performance is poor.

Did you set start row and end row in the Scan? Besides, if the random read
performance of your cluster is ok, maybe smallscan could help you.
HBASE-9488 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9488>


On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:06 PM, LEI Xiaofeng <leixf@ihep.ac.cn> wrote:

> Hi,
> I am running hbase-0.94.6-cdh4.5.0 and set up a cluster of 5 nodes. The
> random read performance is ok, but the scan performance is poor.
> I tried to increase "hbase.client.scanner.caching" to 100 to promote the
> scan performance but it made  no difference. And when I tried to make
> smaller blocks by setting "BLOCKSIZE" when created tables to get better
> random read performance it made no difference too.
> So, I am wondering if anyone could give some advice to solve this problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Haosdent Huang

--089e015369f062002304ef608469--