Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E85A10979 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48430 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2013 07:23:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 48129 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2013 07:23:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 48119 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2013 07:23:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:23:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pradeepg26@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.174] (HELO mail-wi0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:23:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z2so661706wiv.1 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:23:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nqAeNsHWmj+RHUlKRO8VpvOeFwIaWNh5TPD5MUMcS5w=; b=Vq4kyupJt43PII76nRYpXBuHh7wHpPRu3XitmJ/S7+V8khw4FQKJqGmSEcKOnprAah ouY3dYldlGGMtw36AFHNbOCdZFdWRYrFOl40Uve2LfRzudhF5mTJZg63fPhe80YGpxen 3ZlQIqDfxwYM4OxOQWr1aO5E2i+Y+0dZi20WDWZtpO/a2sl4S60jA5PZQ3qq2Z6NNI62 rCCL7rI4i5mypLvCjZkSXpVun4lWOY7f13hfeiQQNwJj3akQQyYXffegdvqCfJgEe5Om WEp9KksDKx+iBWMcsTjgOMp9vHDHOQViqhtblXeYFizhgeYoLbdwd2jhg06S/oR0Ewee 107g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.181.12.71 with SMTP id eo7mr1188396wid.28.1386919398270; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:23:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.106.197 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:23:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:23:18 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zookeeper.znode.parent mismatch exception From: Pradeep Gollakota To: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7ae010eb7904ed6556b6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043c7ae010eb7904ed6556b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Did you recently upgrade to 0.96? This is a problem I faced with mismatched clients connecting to an 0.96 cluster. Starting in that version, the root node for zookeeper chanced from /hbase to /hbase-unsecure (if in unsecure mode). On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Sandeep L wrote: > Hi, > Our production cluster is in distributed mode with 5 servers as zookeeper > quorum. > While accessing production HBase server from our application we are > getting zookeeper.znode.parent mismatch exception. > Following is exception in our log files: > from org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZooKeeperNodeTracker in > pool-67467-thread-1Check the value configured in 'zookeeper.znode.parent'. > There could be a mismatch with the one configured in the master. > > We checked all hbase-site.xml files to find any mismatches in > configurations, but no luck all configuration files same. We don't have any > configuration with name zookeeper.znode.parent in hbase-site.xml, but I > have one configuration with same name in hbase-defalut.xml with value as > /hbase. > In our application server we don't have any file with name > hbase-default.xml, but we have hbase-site.xml in it. > > Can someone help us to resolve this issue. > > Thanks,Sandeep. --f46d043c7ae010eb7904ed6556b6--