hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
Subject Re: HTable writeAsyncBuffer
Date Mon, 09 Dec 2013 22:57:56 GMT
are there downsides if we were to add all these operations to the
writeAsyncBuffer? are there any usages of HTable.put that rely on it being
send off instead of being put in a buffer?


On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Koert Kuipers <koert@tresata.com> wrote:
>
> > hey st.ack
> >
> > well i am considering creating lots of deletes from a map-reduce job
> > instead of puts, and was looking at the code to see how efficient that
> > would be...
> >
> >
>
> You  have been writing code for a while (smile)?
>
>
>
> > but now i am more generally wondering if there is any downside to making
> > all these operations go into the buffer instead of treating puts special.
> >
> >
> I'm not sure I understand the question.  If you are asking if doing mass
> individual deletes of cells is to be avoided, the answer is yes.  But maybe
> I have you wrong?
>
> St.Ack
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message