hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ramkrishna vasudevan <ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Did major compaction really happen?
Date Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:25:00 GMT
The main advantage you get by disabled major compaction is that the major
compaction threads do not wake up to perform the major compaction and which
is generally resource intensive as it used to work on a large set of files.

Regards
Ram


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:

> YEs in a way it is true.  But do you have deletes in your usecase.  If it
> is not there then this does not do anything different other than what a
> minor compaction would do.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM, branky <branky34@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So, we can't say there's a way to completely avoid major compaction,
>> right?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message