Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CA8C10F91 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26778 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2013 16:50:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-user-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 26718 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2013 16:50:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 26709 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2013 16:50:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:50:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jilal.oussama@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.181] (HELO mail-lb0-f181.google.com) (209.85.217.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:50:47 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q8so1173329lbi.12 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:50:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CLB/WzbyngCTO1U6cd3WAMlfpUIqPiFMvAEKWH40GQE=; b=F3Mh3vIJHDNDN8tqvkYY/2G3Ktf9BcLL0DEbNdl2oen1wjLrBvjYpoluP1VhBcfjjC +BR8FiyKoVulpHkd2pUy44+IbuXCnIhVBm/BHPq+E4XLP5NJp5dmaEF8JyDUA9G7I8Df K2OjUTSr/4QT721CjslRo4+ZAN1b3RPqfE2ufje5+0M7Pmyy2J4RV1zgESJ3U847yAk3 Rn+rAUJ8GvUyXQqT2Hlf2MZdD5wUeBH1T29CbyDZ9cK+12QdCEQf7Hd6xRtPeLWXCquN MBlpgRNmuvXm6EqLBdWKunCwelxjzQTqh0L9M3m4oNInmOOBzGF7slguyhIsGhz2uKdU vgaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.23.137 with SMTP id m9mr10334660laf.17.1385139027111; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:50:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.62.42 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:50:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:50:27 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FTS performance From: Jilal Oussama To: Mailing List Apache HBase Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160a676acf5a704ebc6cfcb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0160a676acf5a704ebc6cfcb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 What I have been avoiding all along ... MR & CoProcessors ... thanks all 2013/11/22 Asaf Mesika > You're right, just in bear mind response time won't match an online query > if this is what you are aiming at. > > On Friday, November 22, 2013, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote: > > > You can also simply do a MR job without any coprocessors nor Phoenix > > required.... > > > > > > 2013/11/22 Asaf Mesika > > > > > > The best way is to go parallel with coprocessors. Try Phoenix which > > > has this built in or write your own. > > > > > > On Friday, November 22, 2013, Jilal Oussama wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I am looking for some performance suggestions. > > > > > > > > I would like to get all the keys of table (wich contains ~100 million > > > > rows). > > > > > > > > Currently, I am doing a FTS with FirstKeyOnlyFilter and KeyOnlyFilter > > > using > > > > Thrift from a python script, and I find it very slow ... > > > > > > > > Any suggestions whould be appreciable. > > > > > > > > HBase : 0.94.13 > > > > Hadoop : 1.2.1 > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > > > --089e0160a676acf5a704ebc6cfcb--