hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jilal Oussama <jilal.ouss...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: FTS performance
Date Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:50:27 GMT
What I have been avoiding all along ... MR & CoProcessors ... thanks all


2013/11/22 Asaf Mesika <asaf.mesika@gmail.com>

> You're right, just in bear mind response time won't match an online query
> if this is what you are aiming at.
>
> On Friday, November 22, 2013, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
>
> > You can also simply do a MR job without any coprocessors nor Phoenix
> > required....
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/22 Asaf Mesika <asaf.mesika@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >
> > > The best way is to go parallel with coprocessors. Try Phoenix which
> > > has this built in or write your own.
> > >
> > > On Friday, November 22, 2013, Jilal Oussama wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I am looking for some performance suggestions.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to get all the keys of table (wich contains ~100 million
> > > > rows).
> > > >
> > > > Currently, I am doing a FTS with FirstKeyOnlyFilter and KeyOnlyFilter
> > > using
> > > > Thrift from a python script, and I find it very slow ...
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions whould be appreciable.
> > > >
> > > > HBase : 0.94.13
> > > > Hadoop : 1.2.1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message